2026 NFL season, half-PPR rankings
Sign inCompare services
  1. Fan50
  2. Accuracy
  3. 2026 half-PPR QB

Season standings

Most accurate QB rankings, 2026 half-PPR

  • QB · Season through week 7
  • Methodology v1
  • Published 2026-10-29

Who has the most accurate QB rankings in 2026?

FantasyPros Consensus has the most accurate QB rankings of 2026 through Week 7, with a season skill score of 17.3. No individual ranker has beaten the FantasyPros consensus at QB this season. That's over 7 scored weeks. The skill score shows how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect.

Ranked
15
Unranked
0

Platform standings

Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.

QB · Season through week 7, 2026 half-PPR. Results published 2026-10-29. Ties at the displayed precision share a rank.
RankRankerSeason skill scorevs consensusRight when they disagreedWeeks scoredLatest week
1
FantasyPros Consensus
Consensus
17.3
Benchmark–7 of 710.3 wk 7
2
Yahoo Sports Consensus
Consensus
16.4
0.9 behind47%7 of 710.3 wk 7
3
Footballguys (PPR board)
Consensus
16.1
1.1 behind54%7 of 78.7 wk 7
4
Draft Sharks
Consensus
14.7
2.5 behind46%7 of 76.6 wk 7
5
FFToday
Team
11.7
5.6 behind40%7 of 73.0 wk 7
6
FF Toolbox (PPR board)
Consensus
11.6
5.7 behind47%7 of 728.5 wk 7
7
ESPN app projections
Team
9.8
7.5 behind46%7 of 74.0 wk 7

Individual expert standings

Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.

QB · Season through week 7, 2026 half-PPR. Results published 2026-10-29. Ties at the displayed precision share a rank.
RankRankerSeason skill scorevs consensusRight when they disagreedWeeks scoredLatest week
1
Eric Moody
Individual
15.3
2.0 behind47%7 of 7-11.1 wk 7
2
Tristan H. Cockcroft
Individual
14.3
3.0 behind51%7 of 7-11.1 wk 7
3
Field Yates
Individual
12.6
4.6 behind48%7 of 7-9.0 wk 7
4
Matt Bowen
Individual
12.4
4.8 behind47%7 of 7-12.7 wk 7
5
Eric Karabell
Individual
12.2
5.1 behind45%7 of 7-15.3 wk 7
6
Daniel Dopp
Individual
11.5
5.7 behind47%7 of 7-14.3 wk 7
7
Liz Loza
Individual
10.9
6.3 behind46%7 of 7-13.7 wk 7
8
Mike Clay
Individual
9.4
7.8 behind44%7 of 7-9.6 wk 7

QB categories

Streaming quarterbacks

Weekly reports

Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7

Limitations

  • Rankings lock 5 minutes before each week's first scheduled game. News after the lock isn't reflected.
  • A small lead isn't automatically meaningful. Minimum sample gates limit small-sample claims; they don't establish statistical confidence.
  • QB results don't carry over to other positions or scoring formats.
  • Past measured results don't establish future superiority.
v1Formula, lock policy, ties and missing-data treatment are in the methodology. Results use one methodology version per cohort; versions are never averaged together.Read the methodology

Compare fantasy football services · Report a correction