Who has the most accurate TE rankings in 2026?
Eric Moody has the most accurate TE rankings of 2026 through Week 7, with a season skill score of 13.1. It's the only ranker ahead of the FantasyPros consensus (12.5). That's over 7 scored weeks. The skill score shows how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect.
- Ranked
- 16
- Unranked
- 0
Platform standings
Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.
| Rank | Ranker | Season skill score | vs consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  FantasyPros ConsensusConsensus | 12.5 | Benchmark |
| 2 |  Yahoo Sports ConsensusConsensus | 10.3 | 2.2 behind |
| 3 |  Draft SharksConsensus | 10.2 | 2.3 behind |
| 4 |  Footballguys (PPR board)Consensus | 9.7 | 2.8 behind |
| 5 |  FFTodayTeam | 7.6 | 4.9 behind |
| 6 | 6.3 | 6.2 behind | |
| 7 |  FF Toolbox (PPR board)Consensus | 5.0 | 7.5 behind |
Individual expert standings
Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.
| Rank | Ranker | Season skill score | vs consensus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Eric MoodyIndividual | 13.1 | 0.6 ahead |
| 2 |  Mick CiallelaIndividual | 11.5 | 1.0 behind |
| 3 |  Tristan H. CockcroftIndividual | 9.4 | 3.1 behind |
| 4 |  Mike ClayIndividual | 8.3 | 4.2 behind |
| 5 | Daniel Dopp Individual | 8.1 | 4.4 behind |
| 5 |  Liz LozaIndividual | 8.1 | 4.4 behind |
| 7 |  Matt BowenIndividual | 7.1 | 5.4 behind |
| 7 |  Eric KarabellIndividual | 7.1 | 5.4 behind |
| 9 |  Field YatesIndividual | 7.0 | 5.5 behind |
TE categories
Weekly reports
Limitations
- Rankings lock 5 minutes before each week's first scheduled game. News after the lock isn't reflected.
- A small lead isn't automatically meaningful. Minimum sample gates limit small-sample claims; they don't establish statistical confidence.
- TE results don't carry over to other positions or scoring formats.
- Past measured results don't establish future superiority.