2026 NFL season, half-PPR rankings
Sign inCompare services
  1. Fan50
  2. Accuracy
  3. 2026 half-PPR WR

Season standings

Most accurate WR rankings, 2026 half-PPR

  • WR · Season through week 7
  • Methodology v1
  • Published 2026-10-29

Who has the most accurate WR rankings in 2026?

FantasyPros Consensus has the most accurate WR rankings of 2026 through Week 7, with a season skill score of 24.2. No individual ranker has beaten the FantasyPros consensus at WR this season. That's over 7 scored weeks. The skill score shows how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect.

Ranked
16
Unranked
0

Platform standings

Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.

WR · Season through week 7, 2026 half-PPR. Results published 2026-10-29. Ties at the displayed precision share a rank.
RankRankerSeason skill scorevs consensusRight when they disagreedWeeks scoredLatest week
1
FantasyPros Consensus
Consensus
24.2
Benchmark–7 of 732.0 wk 7
2
Yahoo Sports Consensus
Consensus
23.1
1.1 behind51%7 of 732.0 wk 7
3
Draft Sharks
Consensus
22.8
1.4 behind50%7 of 728.0 wk 7
4
Footballguys (PPR board)
Consensus
21.6
2.6 behind47%7 of 725.2 wk 7
5
FFToday
Team
20.6
3.6 behind45%7 of 723.9 wk 7
6
FF Toolbox (PPR board)
Consensus
17.0
7.1 behind49%7 of 727.6 wk 7
7
ESPN app projections
Team
16.6
7.6 behind46%7 of 716.0 wk 7

Individual expert standings

Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.

WR · Season through week 7, 2026 half-PPR. Results published 2026-10-29. Ties at the displayed precision share a rank.
RankRankerSeason skill scorevs consensusRight when they disagreedWeeks scoredLatest week
1
Tristan H. Cockcroft
Individual
19.8
4.3 behind50%7 of 721.9 wk 7
2
Field Yates
Individual
19.6
4.6 behind51%7 of 720.9 wk 7
3
Mick Ciallela
Individual
19.4
4.8 behind52%7 of 730.6 wk 7
4
Mike Clay
Individual
18.8
5.4 behind47%7 of 721.0 wk 7
4
Matt Bowen
Individual
18.8
5.4 behind49%7 of 721.1 wk 7
6
Eric Moody
Individual
18.6
5.6 behind47%7 of 722.7 wk 7
6
Daniel Dopp
Individual
18.6
5.6 behind48%7 of 721.1 wk 7
8
Liz Loza
Individual
18.4
5.8 behind49%7 of 720.0 wk 7
9
Eric Karabell
Individual
17.8
6.4 behind46%7 of 719.3 wk 7

WR categories

Bold WR callsDeep WR rankings

Weekly reports

Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7

Limitations

  • Rankings lock 5 minutes before each week's first scheduled game. News after the lock isn't reflected.
  • A small lead isn't automatically meaningful. Minimum sample gates limit small-sample claims; they don't establish statistical confidence.
  • WR results don't carry over to other positions or scoring formats.
  • Past measured results don't establish future superiority.
v1Formula, lock policy, ties and missing-data treatment are in the methodology. Results use one methodology version per cohort; versions are never averaged together.Read the methodology

Compare fantasy football services · Report a correction