2026 NFL season, half-PPR rankings
Sign inCompare services
  1. Fan50
  2. Accuracy
  3. 2026 half-PPR RB

Season standings

Most accurate RB rankings, 2026 half-PPR

  • RB · Season through week 7
  • Methodology v1
  • Published 2026-10-29

Who has the most accurate RB rankings in 2026?

FantasyPros Consensus has the most accurate RB rankings of 2026 through Week 7, with a season skill score of 36.8. No individual ranker has beaten the FantasyPros consensus at RB this season. That's over 7 scored weeks. The skill score shows how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect.

Ranked
16
Unranked
0

Platform standings

Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.

RB · Season through week 7, 2026 half-PPR. Results published 2026-10-29. Ties at the displayed precision share a rank.
RankRankerSeason skill scorevs consensusRight when they disagreedWeeks scoredLatest week
1
FantasyPros Consensus
Consensus
36.8
Benchmark–7 of 729.1 wk 7
2
Draft Sharks
Consensus
36.0
0.8 behind48%7 of 724.6 wk 7
3
Footballguys (PPR board)
Consensus
35.9
0.8 behind47%7 of 729.0 wk 7
4
Yahoo Sports Consensus
Consensus
35.5
1.2 behind46%7 of 726.1 wk 7
5
FFToday
Team
34.7
2.1 behind49%7 of 728.1 wk 7
6
ESPN app projections
Team
32.6
4.2 behind46%7 of 723.7 wk 7
7
FF Toolbox (PPR board)
Consensus
31.2
5.6 behind44%7 of 729.3 wk 7

Individual expert standings

Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.

RB · Season through week 7, 2026 half-PPR. Results published 2026-10-29. Ties at the displayed precision share a rank.
RankRankerSeason skill scorevs consensusRight when they disagreedWeeks scoredLatest week
1
Mick Ciallela
Individual
31.0
5.8 behind43%7 of 720.7 wk 7
2
Liz Loza
Individual
29.7
7.1 behind44%7 of 724.7 wk 7
3
Tristan H. Cockcroft
Individual
29.6
7.1 behind46%7 of 724.1 wk 7
4
Mike Clay
Individual
29.3
7.5 behind46%7 of 724.3 wk 7
5
Matt Bowen
Individual
29.0
7.8 behind44%7 of 725.1 wk 7
6
Eric Moody
Individual
28.7
8.1 behind44%7 of 720.9 wk 7
7
Field Yates
Individual
28.5
8.2 behind42%7 of 723.3 wk 7
8
Daniel Dopp
Individual
28.4
8.3 behind41%7 of 723.1 wk 7
9
Eric Karabell
Individual
28.1
8.7 behind43%7 of 726.7 wk 7

RB categories

Bold RB callsDeep RB rankings

Weekly reports

Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7

Limitations

  • Rankings lock 5 minutes before each week's first scheduled game. News after the lock isn't reflected.
  • A small lead isn't automatically meaningful. Minimum sample gates limit small-sample claims; they don't establish statistical confidence.
  • RB results don't carry over to other positions or scoring formats.
  • Past measured results don't establish future superiority.
v1Formula, lock policy, ties and missing-data treatment are in the methodology. Results use one methodology version per cohort; versions are never averaged together.Read the methodology

Compare fantasy football services · Report a correction